<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Converge Consulting Group Inc. Articles and News &#187; White Papers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.converge-group.net/category/a3-white-papers/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.converge-group.net</link>
	<description>People Process Performance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 17:10:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Cult of Statistical Significance &#8211; Simplified</title>
		<link>http://www.converge-group.net/648/</link>
		<comments>http://www.converge-group.net/648/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 00:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>robertgerst</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mgmt 4.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White Papers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.converge-group.net/?p=648</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Converge Consulting Group clients have heard us talk about the misuse of statistical significance testing, specifically, using statistical significance as a test for practical importance or material significance. This is the reason why so much employee, customer and operational research gets the answers so wrong, so often, amounting to little more, and often less, than junk<p align="right"><a href="http://www.converge-group.net/648/">Read More…</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.converge-group.net/648/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Decline of Health Services in Alberta</title>
		<link>http://www.converge-group.net/620/</link>
		<comments>http://www.converge-group.net/620/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 21:42:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>robertgerst</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Operational Excellence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White Papers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.converge-group.net/?p=620</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Triumph of Professional over Real Management The past 20 years have seen a steady decline in the provision of health services to Albertans. Waiting times for surgeries, diagnostic services and emergency room visits is increasing, costs are escalating and quality of care has remained constant at best. A day doesn&#8217;t go by without the<p align="right"><a href="http://www.converge-group.net/620/">Read More…</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.converge-group.net/620/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Inspections and Audits</title>
		<link>http://www.converge-group.net/608/</link>
		<comments>http://www.converge-group.net/608/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 23:20:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>robertgerst</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Operational Excellence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tools and Techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White Papers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.converge-group.net/?p=608</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Developing a cost effective approach Some organizations equate quality with the level of inspection. The greater the number of inspections, checks, audits or evaluations, the greater the level of quality that is assumed to be in the final product or service. Unfortunately for these organizations, just the opposite is true. Quality assurance is only required when processes<p align="right"><a href="http://www.converge-group.net/608/">Read More…</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.converge-group.net/608/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Analyzing WCB Injury Rate Data</title>
		<link>http://www.converge-group.net/595/</link>
		<comments>http://www.converge-group.net/595/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 21:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>robertgerst</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Performance Measurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White Papers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.converge-group.net/?p=595</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How to properly analyze and interpret Alberta injury rate data On October 01, 2010, the Alberta Government publically released workplace injury &#38; fatality records. This made the Province the first in Canada to release a comprehensive list.  Anyone can now access information about worksite injuries and fatalities involving more than 140,000 employers insured by the Workers<p align="right"><a href="http://www.converge-group.net/595/">Read More…</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.converge-group.net/595/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The New Management Thinking</title>
		<link>http://www.converge-group.net/494/</link>
		<comments>http://www.converge-group.net/494/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 16:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>robertgerst</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Operational Excellence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White Papers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.converge-group.net/?p=494</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Managers are being flooded by a host of management ideas and models &#8212; Six Sigma, process re-engineering, Lean Enterprise, Lean Production, operational excellence, quality management, value chain analysis, business process redesign, process outcomes management and performance measurement. Whatever else these things are intended to produce, confusion is definitely a by-product. To help work through the<p align="right"><a href="http://www.converge-group.net/494/">Read More…</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.converge-group.net/494/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Voice of the Employee FAQ</title>
		<link>http://www.converge-group.net/487/</link>
		<comments>http://www.converge-group.net/487/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 16:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>robertgerst</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Survey Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voice of the Employee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White Papers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.converge-group.net/?p=487</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More and more organizations are abandoning traditional survey research in favour of Voice of the Customer (VoC) or Voice of the Employee (VoE) methods. This trend has accelerated with recent attacks by the scientific/statistical community on the widespread misapplication of traditional survey research (including misuse of statistical significance) and flagrant overreaching, especially when making comparisons<p align="right"><a href="http://www.converge-group.net/487/">Read More…</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.converge-group.net/487/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

